This has lead to many people sharing the full articles with others online. I have myself read quite a few of those, as I do not own a subscription for any online journalism site. Usually I get my news off of ERR, a news site that is completely ad-free and free to use. They have a lot of good quality content. For example, Delfi is seemingly half-way filled with articles like "10 things men need to know about women". And I mean, I do not mind it but when I am browsing news I am usually looking for other types of information. I think I could go on a rant about the quality of the content - it is never really that good and I do not enjoy seeing so many clickbait titles.
I probably can´t think of a good way for an online journalism page to make enough money to "survive" - I can´t really support them myself. However, I would like to see a situation where people who pay to read their content do not have to watch ads. I mean, it is obvious - not everyone uses adblock (and some people even think it to be unethical; I think overusing ads is the unethical thing here).
I also believe that private media is still really important - only having national media feels like something out of North Korea. However, the online journalism pages have to now figure out how to stay afloat.
I think one of the key problems that the online journalism websites face today is that the younger generations do not read as much news (probably). Still, I see almost no way for them to improve since it seems that they are not capable of being with even less ads or creating a constant flow of good quality content.
I decided to visit Delfi without adblock and clicked on the very first article they had available to read. The article was created by Kroonika, a yellow magazine portion of Delfi. It was about a woman getting stuck in a burning building and passing out in the ambulance..
Kommentaare ei ole:
Postita kommentaar